This order is not relevant to stocks, companies, markets, or the economy. Below is a short summary of the judgement:

Case Details

  • Case Name: Orchid Gardens Residents Welfare Association (Suncity) vs M/s Vipul Limited & Ors.
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar Gracy L. Bawitlung
  • Civil Appeal No.: 6722/2026
  • Date of Order: 04-06-2026

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Orchid Gardens Residents Welfare Association (Suncity)
  • Respondents: M/s Vipul Limited (Respondent No.1), Respondent No.2 (unnamed), Respondent No.3 (unnamed)
  • Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Aditya Singh (AOR), Mr. Kamal Kishor (Adv.), Mr. Pankaj Yadav (Adv.)
  • Counsel for Respondents: Ms. Muskan Saxena (Adv.), Mr. Vineet Dwivedi (Adv.), Sarojanand Jha (AOR), Ms. Rajreeta Ghosh (Adv.), Mr. Rahul Kumar (Adv.)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • No substantive substantive issues were discussed; the proceedings focused on procedural compliance and filing requirements.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court noted that the vakalatnama for Respondent No.1 had been filed on 03.06.2026 and required verification.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Respondent No.1’s counsel was directed to file a counter‑affidavit by 13.07.2026.
  • No appearance was recorded for Respondent No.2.
  • The appellant was ordered to file fresh particulars concerning Respondent No.3 by 11.06.2026.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The parties must ensure the filing of the required affidavits and particulars within the stipulated dates.
  • The Registry is to verify the vakalatnama filing and update records accordingly.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The matter was listed for a further hearing on 04.08.2026.
  • A copy of the Record of Proceedings is to be furnished to the concerned advocates‑on‑record for compliance.