Case Details

Case Name: Padma Fabricators Private Limited & Ors. vs Registrar of Companies NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Court/Authority: National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench (Court-II)

Case Number: Company Appeal No. 70/252/ND/2025

Order Date: 22.05.2026

Period of Violation: Non-filing of statutory returns from financial year 2017-18 onwards

Parties Involved

Petitioners/Appellants:

  • Padma Fabricators Private Limited (CIN: U29199DL1988PTC032581)
  • Navneet Kumar Mittal (Director)
  • Ruchira Mittal (Director)
  • Yajur Mittal (Director)

Respondents:

  • Registrar of Companies NCT of Delhi & Haryana
  • Income Tax Department

Legal Representatives:

  • For Appellant: Adv. Sanket Gupta
  • For IT Dept: Adv. Shlok Chandra SSC alongwith Madhavi Shukla and Naincy Jain JSC

Tribunal Members:

  • Sh. Ashok Kumar Bhardwaj, Hon'ble Member (J)
  • Ms. Reena Sinha Puri, Hon'ble Member (T)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The company's name was struck off from the Register of Companies by ROC, NCT of Delhi and Haryana vide Public Notice ROC/DEL/248/STK-7/2341 dated 20.04.2022
  • The company had failed to file statutory returns and documents from financial year 2017-18 onwards
  • Last statutory filings were made for financial year 2016-17
  • ROC opposed restoration on grounds that company was not operational at time of strike-off based on financial statements
  • ROC raised objection on limitation with reference to prior notices issued under Section 248
  • Bank statements and income tax returns were not on record

Findings & Observations

  • The Tribunal found that the appeal filed on 16.04.2025 was within the prescribed limitation period of three years from the strike-off order dated 20.04.2022
  • The company owns valuable immovable property admeasuring 942 sq. metres situated at 22/11 SSGT Road, UPSIDC Industrial Area, Ghaziabad, acquired under lease deed dated 29.03.2008
  • The company holds a fixed deposit of approximately ₹11,00,000 with Union Bank of India
  • Cited precedent: Felpact (P.) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2017) 4 Gau LR 433 - where company owns substantial immovable property, restoration may be warranted to prevent misuse, encroachment or dissipation of assets
  • Cited precedent: Mace Platronics Pvt. Ltd. v. ROC (2010) 104 SCL 277 (Del) - Tribunal retains power to restore company even where default is established, particularly where company is otherwise a running concern
  • The company had secured Expression of Interest dated 15.01.2025 from M/s Shashi Ranjan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. for business alliance for warehouse operations and inventory management
  • Company was incorporated on 27.07.1988 under Companies Act, 1956 with authorized and paid-up share capital of ₹10,00,000
  • Company's main objects include manufacturing, fabrication, trading, import/export of industrial and engineering machinery, consultancy services, execution of turnkey projects
  • Company remained operational till 2006, then activities were impacted due to serious medical condition of Managing Director and COVID-19 period

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Restoration ordered subject to payment of cost of ₹8,00,000 (Rupees eight Lakhs Only) to be paid to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund
  • ROC directed to restore status of company from "struck off" to "Active"
  • Company directed to file all pending statutory documents including Annual Accounts and Annual Returns in default along with prescribed fee/additional fee/fine within 45 days from restoration date
  • Company directed to submit certified copy of order to ROC within thirty days of receipt
  • Company directed to comply with provisions of Income Tax Act and CGST Act, 2017, and discharge all pending statutory dues pertaining to period during which name remained struck off
  • Bank accounts, if frozen, shall get defrozen after compliance

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Company must file all pending statutory documents for financial years 2017-18 to 2023-24 (financial statements already prepared and placed on record)
  • Must pay all applicable fees, additional fees, and fines for late filing
  • Must comply with all provisions of Income Tax Act and CGST Act, 2017
  • Must discharge all pending statutory dues including for the period when company name was struck off

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Appeal allowed with terms and conditions
  • Restoration order is confined to violations leading to striking off of name
  • Does not prevent Respondent from taking appropriate action for any other violations/offenses committed by company prior or during striking off period
  • Copy of order to be served to parties