Authority: Supreme Court of India (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)
Order Date: 22 September 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Appellants – M/S Parthivi Construction Pvt. Ltd. & others; Respondents – Shri Bhuneswar Prasad Verma & Anr.
- Background: RERA, Raipur ordered the appellants to pay ₹1,06,79,900 to the respondent on 27‑06‑2025. The appellants appealed to the Chhattisgarh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal under Section 44, seeking exemption from depositing 30% of the awarded amount. The Tribunal rejected the exemption and directed full deposit of the award.
- High Court: The appellants challenged the Tribunal’s order in the High Court, which dismissed the challenge.
- Supreme Court Petition: The appellants filed a Special Leave Petition arguing that the Tribunal should have discretion to require only a 30% pre‑deposit, citing Newtech Promoters and Developers Private Limited (2021) 18 SCC 1, which they claimed did not mandate full deposit.
- Counsel Submissions: Mr. Sameer Shrivastava (appellants) argued for discretion; Mr. Amrendra Kumar Mehta (respondents) contended that full deposit is mandatory per the Newtech judgment.
Final Outcome
- The Court held that the proviso to sub‑section (5) of Section 43 of the Chhattisgarh Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 obliges a promoter to deposit the total amount of compensation (including interest) before filing an appeal against an order directing payment of compensation.
- The Court relied on paragraphs 121, 122, 128, 136, and 137 of the Newtech judgment, confirming that full pre‑deposit is required and that the Tribunal’s direction was lawful.
- Consequently, the appeal is dismissed, and the Appellate Tribunal’s order directing full deposit stands.
- The Court directed that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of as per the signed reportable order.
Topics: Real Estate Regulation, Appeal Deposit, Supreme Court Decision