Case Details

  • Case name: Phoenix Arc Private Limited vs. Samarpana Charitable Trust & Ors.
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeal No.5182/2025 (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14061/2024).
  • Order date: 9 April 2025 (signed corrected order).
  • Underlying orders: High Court order dated 18‑Mar‑2024 (CMP No.6040/2024, OSA SR No.8560/2024) rejecting leave to appeal against Single Judge order dated 5‑Sep‑2022 (OP No.260/2022).
  • Period of dispute: Relates to property‑sale order dated 5‑Sep‑2022.

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Phoenix Arc Private Limited.
  • Respondent No.1: Samarpana Charitable Trust (and others).
  • Respondent No.2: Chennai Metro Rail Project.
  • Senior counsel for appellant: Mr. Ranjit Kumar (Sr. Adv.).
  • Senior counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr. Sanjay Nuli (Sr. Adv.).
  • Senior counsel for Respondent No.2: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi (Sr. Adv.).
  • Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Appellant contended it was not a party before the learned Single Judge, rendering the Single Judge’s order in OP No.260/2022 untenable.
  • High Court had declined to grant leave to appeal against the Single Judge’s order dated 5‑Sep‑2022.
  • The Single Judge’s order (para 11) granted permission to sell certain property; para 12 directed that remaining property (Schedule A items 2 & 3) remain in custody of the Trust.
  • Settlement Deed dated 29‑Jan‑2021 identified mortgagors P.J.K. Sairam and P.K.S. Prashath for a loan secured from Andhra Bank; Phoenix Arc is the assignee under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
  • Seven suits are pending between the parties; the Trust should not claim ownership of the property pending resolution.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that the Division Bench of the High Court ought to have granted leave to the petitioner, as the petitioner was not a party before the Single Judge.
  • The Court noted that the interim order dated 19‑Jul‑2024, which stays the Trust’s claim over the property, should continue but must not impede the Chennai Metro Rail Project’s interests.
  • No substantive comment was made on the merits of the High Court’s order.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order that rejected leave to appeal.
  • Leave to appeal was granted to Phoenix Arc Private Limited against the Single Judge’s order dated 5‑Sep‑2022.
  • The appeal is to be registered and heard by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court within two months from the date of this order.
  • The interim order dated 19‑Jul‑2024 remains in force, with the clarification that it shall not affect the Chennai Metro Rail Project.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The High Court is directed to adhere to the two‑month time limit for the Division Bench hearing, considering the large public project involved.
  • All pending applications, if any, are to be disposed of alongside the appeal.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Leave to appeal granted; the appeal stands disposed of per the signed corrected order.
  • Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
  • The interim order continues until the Division Bench decides the appeal, without hindering the Chennai Metro Rail Project’s activities.