Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 25‑06‑2026

Case Overview

  • Parties: Appellant/Applicant M/s Prime Properties vs Respondent M/s Bhagya Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association & Ors.
  • Origin: Arises from the impugned final judgment dated 01‑10‑2018 in Civil Appeal No. 10128/2018 of this Court.
  • Pending matters: Four suits between the parties are pending before the concerned Trial Court.
  • Prior directives: The Court had earlier directed a status‑quo with respect to possession on 01‑10‑2018 and reiterated it on 19‑08‑2020 in a Contempt Petition.
  • High Court involvement: W.P. No. 3594/2023 before the Telangana High Court, dated 19‑09‑2025, directed police assistance to enforce the status‑quo and allowed the aggrieved party to approach competent forums for relief.
  • Complaints by petitioner: Applications filed before State Authorities on 02‑01‑2024, 17‑07‑2025, 18‑11‑2025, 24‑11‑2025 and 13‑04‑2026 alleging third‑party encroachment.
  • Applications before this Court (all under MA Diary No. 27391/2026):
  • IA No. 155699/2026 – permission to file impleadment application (allowed).
  • IA No. 139786/2026 – impleadment/intervention (allowed).
  • IA No. 150655/2026 – seeks direction to the State of Telangana to enforce the 2018 status‑quo and other appropriate orders.
  • IA No. 155536/2026 – condonation of delay (granted).

Final Outcome

1. Permission to file impleadment application (IA 155699/2026) allowed.

2. Impleadment/intervention application (IA 139786/2026) allowed.

3. Delay in filing condoned.

4. The Court directs the State of Telangana, represented by the Chief Secretary, Director General of Police and officials, to strictly enforce the status‑quo dated 01‑10‑2018.

5. The Revenue Department shall demarcate the area for erection of a boundary wall within one week of this order.

6. The petitioner (Prime Properties) shall commence erection of the boundary wall immediately after demarcation and bear the entire cost of construction.

7. A senior police officer shall be deputed by the Superintendent of Police to provide police protection to the petitioner during erection, ensuring uninterrupted compliance.

8. The erection of the boundary wall shall not create any additional equity in favour of the petitioner; the underlying suits will be decided on their merits.

9. All other legal and factual contentions of the parties remain pending adjudication in the existing proceedings.

10. Notice issued, returnable on 21 July 2026.

11. The matter is tagged with Contempt Petition (C) No. 433/2020 in Civil Appeal No. 10128/2018.

12. The order is recorded by Court Master Nisha Khulbe and Akshay Kumar Bhoria.

Topics: Property Dispute, Court Order