Case Details

  • Case Name: Puma Sports India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar (Sh. Apoorv Singh)
  • Civil Appeal Numbers: 7262‑7263/2013
  • Order Date: 29‑05‑2026
  • Period of Dispute: Not specified (bank guarantee period 08.05.2026‑08.05.2027)

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Puma Sports India Pvt. Ltd.
  • Counsel: Mr. Aditya Singh (Advocate‑on‑Record)
  • Respondent: Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust
  • Counsel: Mr. Viresh B. Saharya (Advocate‑on‑Record), Mr. Rishabh Mathur (Advocate)
  • Registrar: Sh. Apoorv Singh
  • Signature Authority: Rupam Dhamija (digitally signed)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Request for direction in renewal of Bank Guarantee No. GOVBGE503634.
  • Appellant counsel had not filed physical copies of relevant documents in court record.
  • An email dated 20‑05‑2026 was submitted containing copies of Official ID Card, PAN Card, Aadhaar Card, and contact details of two bank officials authorized to sign the guarantee.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court observed that while physical copies were absent, the emailed documents were acknowledged.
  • No substantive legal violation was identified; the matter pertains to procedural compliance for verification of the guarantee.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Court directed that Bank Guarantee No. GOVBGE503634 for Rs. 27,79,000 (valid 08‑05‑2026 to 08‑05‑2027) be verified by the concerned Registrar.
  • The Registry is instructed to “do the needful” and to list the matter again on 09‑06‑2026.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Registrar to verify the guarantee and update the record.
  • Parties to be furnished a copy of this Record of Proceedings for information and compliance.
  • Subsequent listing scheduled for 09‑06‑2026 to ensure completion of verification.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Order issued by Registrar Sh. Apoorv Singh, digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija on 29‑05‑2026 at 17:45:10 IST (Signature Not Verified).
  • No monetary penalty imposed; compliance with verification directive is mandatory.