Case Details
- Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29738/2024
- Parties: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (through its Chairman & Ors.) Petitioner vs Harish Sharma Respondent
- Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
- Case/Order No.: ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.14 SECTION XV
- Date of Order/Hearing: 29-05-2026 (matter called for hearing)
- Period of Dispute/Violation: Not specified; arises from earlier High Court judgment dated 19-09-2024.
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (R.M.G.B.) represented by counsel: Mr. K. Paari Vendhan (AOR), Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Devanshi Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Poornima Gupta.
- Respondent: Harish Sharma (appearing in person but not present at hearing).
- Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- The petition challenges the final judgment and order dated 19-09-2024 in DBSAW No. 912/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur.
- Specific allegations or issues are not detailed in the order; the filing seeks special leave to appeal the High Court decision.
Findings & Observations
- The Court noted that the respondent, Harish Sharma, who was to appear in person, was not present.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- The Court directed:
1. The matter be listed for hearing on 05-10-2026.
2. The Registry shall inform the respondent about the next date of hearing.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- Respondent Harish Sharma is required to appear before the Court on the newly scheduled date.
- The Court Registry must notify the respondent of the hearing date.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- No substantive judgment on the merits of the appeal was rendered; the case is adjourned to 05-10-2026 for further hearing.
- The order is enforceable as a procedural direction from the Supreme Court.