Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29738/2024
  • Parties: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (through its Chairman & Ors.) Petitioner vs Harish Sharma Respondent
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Case/Order No.: ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.14 SECTION XV
  • Date of Order/Hearing: 29-05-2026 (matter called for hearing)
  • Period of Dispute/Violation: Not specified; arises from earlier High Court judgment dated 19-09-2024.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (R.M.G.B.) represented by counsel: Mr. K. Paari Vendhan (AOR), Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Devanshi Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Poornima Gupta.
  • Respondent: Harish Sharma (appearing in person but not present at hearing).
  • Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petition challenges the final judgment and order dated 19-09-2024 in DBSAW No. 912/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur.
  • Specific allegations or issues are not detailed in the order; the filing seeks special leave to appeal the High Court decision.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court noted that the respondent, Harish Sharma, who was to appear in person, was not present.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Court directed:

1. The matter be listed for hearing on 05-10-2026.

2. The Registry shall inform the respondent about the next date of hearing.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Respondent Harish Sharma is required to appear before the Court on the newly scheduled date.
  • The Court Registry must notify the respondent of the hearing date.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • No substantive judgment on the merits of the appeal was rendered; the case is adjourned to 05-10-2026 for further hearing.
  • The order is enforceable as a procedural direction from the Supreme Court.