Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar Court (Mrs. Kaveri)
Order Date: 02 July 2026
Case Overview
- Civil Appeal No. 4283/2026 filed by appellant Vivek against M/s Rajasthan Perfumery Work Pvt. Ltd. & others, seeking exemption from filing O.T. (IA No. 95390/2026).
- Hearing held on 02‑07‑2026 before Registrar Mrs. Kaveri.
- Appellant represented by Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate‑on‑Record.
- Respondent No. 1 (Rajasthan Perfumery) served but has not entered appearance.
- Respondents No. 2 and No. 3 are represented by a team of counsel: Mr. Shivam Raghuwanshi, Ms. Isha Nagpal, Mr. Ram Ji Dwivedi, Ms. Aarjav Rajvi, Mr. Sriram P., AOR Mr. Ramavath Balaji Naik, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey (AOR), Mr. K.K. Bhat, etc.
- A discrepancy was raised by Ld. Counsel Mr. K.K. Bhat stating that the office report incorrectly listed Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey as representing Respondent No. 2; he actually represents Respondent No. 3 only.
Final Outcome
- The Court grants the learned counsel a two‑week period to file a counter‑affidavit.
- The Registry is instructed to verify the representation details and correct the office report accordingly.
- After the two‑week period, the matter will be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Court under the applicable rules.
- A copy of the Record of Proceedings is to be furnished to the concerned Advocate‑on‑Record for compliance.
Topics: Procedural Order, Civil Appeal