Case Details

  • Case name: Rajasthan Urja Vikas and IT Services Limited (formerly Rajasthan Urja Vikas Nigam Limited) vs M/s Fortum Solar Plus Private Limited & Ors.
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
  • Civil Appeal No(s). 11096‑11099/2024
  • Interlocutory Application No. 160005/2026
  • Date of hearing: 29‑May‑2026
  • Period of dispute: Not specified

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Rajasthan Urja Vikas and IT Services Limited (formerly Rajasthan Urja Vikas Nigam Limited)
  • Respondent: M/s Fortum Solar Plus Private Limited & Others
  • Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Anand K. Ganesan, Adv.; Mr. Amal Nair, Adv.; Ms. Pracheta Kar, AOR; Ms. Tanya Bajaj, Adv.; Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, AOR; Mr. Hemant Sahai, Adv.; Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR; Mr. Nitish Gupta, Adv.; Mr. Nipun Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Varnika Tyagi, Adv.; Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.; Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.; Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR; Ms. Divya Jain, Adv.; Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Mannat Waraich, AOR; Ms. Ashabari Thakur, Adv.; Mr. Aneesh Bajaj, Adv.; Mr. Arijit Maitra, Adv.; Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR; Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv.; Mr. Ashutosh Chachaturvedi, Adv.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Aniket Prasoon, Adv.; Mr. Md. Aman Sheikh, Adv.; Ms. Archita Kashyap, Adv.; Ms. Varnika Tyagi, Adv.; etc.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not detail specific allegations; the interlocutory application sought permission to file additional documents.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court considered the request and found no impediment to granting additional time for filing.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties were imposed.
  • Direction: Permission granted to file additional documents.
  • The matter was listed for further hearing on 21‑August‑2026.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Parties must submit the additional documents before the next listed date of 21‑August‑2026.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The interlocutory application was allowed; the Court ordered that the case be listed again on 21‑August‑2026 for further proceedings.