Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 18384/2026 (arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22‑Apr‑2026 in WRITC No. 9902/2025).
  • Petitioner: M/S Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd.
  • Respondent(s): State of Uttar Pradesh & Others.
  • Court: Supreme Court of India, Court No. 6, Section XI.
  • Hearing Date: 25‑May‑2026.
  • Order Date (Signature): 27‑May‑2026.
  • Related Applications: IA No. 159495/2026 (exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment), IA No. 159496/2026 (exemption from filing O.T.), and reference to I.A.No. 232665 of 2025 in Contempt Petition (C) No. 412 of 2012.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd.
  • Respondents: State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents.
  • Standing Counsel for SEBI: To be served a copy of the Special Leave Petition as directed by the Court.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Gautam Awasthi, AOR; Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Adv.; Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv.; Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Adv.; Mr. Rahul Tripathi, Adv.; Mr. Devanshu Yadav, Adv.; Mr. Sameer Pandey, Adv.; Ms. Chandni Sharma, Adv.; Mr. Sahil Sharma, Adv.; Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv.; Mr. Divyanshu Mani Tripathi, Adv.; Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv.; Ms. Dhatri Singh, Adv.; Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv.
  • Counsel for Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Adv.; Ms. Eshita Bhasin, Adv.; Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR; Ms. Anchal Mishra, Adv.; Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Adv.; Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv.; Ms. Dhatri Singh, Adv.; Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petition challenges the validity of the High Court’s final judgment and order dated 22‑Apr‑2026 in WRITC No. 9902/2025. Specific allegations or violations are not detailed in the excerpt.
  • The petitioner also seeks exemption from filing certain documents (C/C and O.T.) as indicated by IA No. 159495/2026 and IA No. 159496/2026.

Findings & Observations

  • The excerpt does not contain substantive findings or legal reasoning; the Court issued procedural directions.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Direction 1: The matter shall be posted before the appropriate Bench handling I.A.No. 232665 of 2025 in Contempt Petition (C) No. 412 of 2012.
  • Direction 2: A copy of the Special Leave Petition must be served on the standing counsel for SEBI forthwith.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The petitioner must ensure the case is transferred to the Bench dealing with the referenced contempt petition.
  • SEBI’s standing counsel must receive the Special Leave Petition copy promptly, enabling any regulatory response.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court’s order consists of the two procedural directives above, signed by Registrar‑cum‑PS Assistant Registrar (Jayant Kumar Arora) on 27‑May‑2026.
  • No substantive judgment on the merits of the petition is rendered in this excerpt; further proceedings will follow as per the directions.