Case Details
- Case Name: Review Petition (C) No. _____ of 2026 (Diary No(s). 17673 of 2026)
- Civil Appeals: Nos. 12892‑12893 of 2024
- Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India (Inherent Jurisdiction)
- Order Date: 29‑04‑2026 (circulated)
- Original Judgment Dates: 30‑01‑2026 in CA No. 12892/2024 and CA No. 12893/2024
- Interlocutory Applications: IA No. 91313/2026 (listing review petition in open court), IA No. 91316/2026 (condonation of delay), IA No. 91318/2026 (ex‑parte stay)
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: M/S SAISUDHIR ENERGY LTD
- Respondent: M/S NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD
- Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandukar
- Registrar: Jayant Kumar Arora, Nidhi Wason (Assistant Registrar)
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- Petitioners sought:
1. Oral hearing of the review petitions in open court.
2. Condonation of delay in filing the review petitions.
3. An ex‑parte stay of the impugned judgment.
- The review was filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, alleging error in the original judgments.
Findings & Observations
- The Court perused the review petitions and concluded that no error is apparent on the face of the record.
- It held that no case for review under the cited rule was established.
- Consequently, the Court found no basis to entertain the review petitions.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- Application for oral hearing is rejected.
- Delay in filing the review petitions is condoned.
- Review petitions (both CA Nos. 12892 and 12893) are dismissed.
- Any pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- No specific corrective measures were directed beyond the disposal of pending interlocutory applications.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The Review Petitions are dismissed as per the signed order of the Hon'ble Justices.
- Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are ordered to be disposed of.
- The order is placed on the file and signed by the Justices.