SC Adjourns S2 Tech.com Appeal

Appellant: Birendra Kumar Agrawal
Respondents: S2 Tech.com India Pvt Ltd and others
Intervention Applicants: Nine home buyers (names not specified)
Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Amit Sibal (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Aishvary Vikram (AOR), Mr. Lucky Sharma, Ms. Navya Bhagat, Mr. Yash Jain, Mr. Saksham Dingra, Ms. Suditi Batra.
Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Dhruv Mehta (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Sanyat Lodha (AOR), Mr. Amaan Khan, Mr. Kartikeya Sharma.
Senior Counsel appearing: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha (Sr. Adv.) for the appellant.
Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran.

The order references an application for intervention filed by nine home buyers that has not been served on all counsel.
It also clarifies that the earlier interim order only stayed the operation of the impugned judgment dated 19‑03‑2026 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 456 of 2024; no separate status‑quo order was issued.

The Court notes the procedural lapse in serving the intervention applications and directs that service be effected before the next hearing.

Directions issued:
Serve the intervention applications to all learned counsel before the next hearing.
Pleadings must be completed by the next date of hearing.
The matter is adjourned and re‑listed for hearing on 30‑07‑2026, after completion of other miscellaneous matters.
The earlier interim order dated 13‑04‑2026 remains in force until the next hearing.

Parties must ensure proper service of the nine home buyers' intervention applications and file any replies, if necessary.
Completion of pleadings is required before the next scheduled hearing.

The Court adjourned the proceedings and scheduled a fresh hearing for 30‑07‑2026.
The interim stay of the NCLAT judgment dated 19‑03‑2026 continues as per the order dated 13‑04‑2026.
No substantive merits of the dispute were decided; the focus was on procedural compliance and scheduling.