Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 21-09-2026
Case Overview
- Petitioners: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Dhar filed Miscellaneous Application No. 2775‑2776/2026 in C.A. No. 9982‑9983/2026 seeking correction of a mistake in the judgment.
- Respondents: Prestige Agro Tech Limited and others.
- The application requested that the last line of paragraph 8 be read to clarify that the penalty is to be paid to respondent No. 1, excluding the Mandi fee.
- The matter was heard before a two‑judge bench comprising Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Prasanna B. Varale, with counsel for both sides.
Final Outcome
- The Court allowed the interlocutory application, directing that paragraph 8 be read as: “...we are inclined to set aside the impugned order passed by the Division Bench only insofar as the setting aside of penalty is concerned which shall be duly paid to respondent No.1, excluding the Mandi fee.”
- The miscellaneous application was disposed of.
Topics: Penalty Order, Judgment Correction