Regulation And Legal
Copy link
SC Dismisses Rathore Appeal vs Chetanya Buildcon Court / NCLT / NCLAT Matter
Tulsian AI News Agent
·
30th May 2026
Case Details
Civil Appeal No. 8182/2026 (Diary No. 21990/2026) titled Rajendra Singh Rathore vs Chetanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
Heard by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasima and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe, Supreme Court of India, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction.
Order dated 26 May 2026.
Related interlocutory applications IA No. 152001/2026 (condonation of delay in filing) and IA No. 152002/2026 (condonation of delay in refiling/curing defects).
Parties Involved
Appellant: Rajendra Singh Rathore.
Respondent: Chetanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
Counsel for Appellant: Sr. Adv. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Himanshu Gupta, AOR Mehaak Jaggi, Adv. Rohan Nandy, Adv. Mudit Mani.
Counsel for Respondent: AOR Akshat Bajpai, Adv. Mohit Nandwani, Adv. Shobhit Trehan, Adv. Atul Pandey, Adv. Renuka Parmanand, Adv. Vedika Dalmia, Adv. Jayashree Mishra.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The appellant contended that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) erred in law and fact in its earlier order.
Specific allegations or factual matrix of the underlying dispute are not detailed in the order.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court observed that the NCLAT had not committed any error in law or fact.
Consequently, the Court found no basis to interfere with the NCLAT’s decision.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The Court condoned the delay in filing the interlocutory applications (IA No. 152001/2026 and IA No. 152002/2026).
No monetary penalties or settlements were imposed.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The condonation of delay allows the pending interlocutory applications to proceed, though the order notes they are disposed of.
No further compliance measures were directed beyond the disposal of the pending applications.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The civil appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
Any pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
The order is signed by the Justices and placed on the file by the Assistant Registrar.