Case/Order No.: Not separately numbered; the petition is identified as No. 18998/2026
Date of Order: 26‑05‑2026
Period of Violation/Dispute: Not specified in the order
Parties Involved
Petitioner(s): Saroj Diagnostic Laboratory & Ors
Counsel: Mr. Paul Jacob (Adv.), Mr. Lakshmeesh S. Kamath (AOR), Ms. Aditi Prakash (Adv.), Ms. Samriti Ahuja (Adv.), Mr. Matthew Thomas (Adv.)
Respondent(s): Siemens Financial Service Private Limited
Counsel: Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya (Adv. through VC), Ms. Salonee Shukla (Adv.), Ms. Shalini Singh (Adv.), Mr. Vaibhav Niti (AOR)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petition sought special leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 07‑05‑2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (C. Arb. AL No. 9860/2026).
Specific allegations or grounds of the appeal are not detailed in the Supreme Court order.
Findings & Observations
The Court, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, expressed that it was not inclined to interfere with the High Court’s judgment/order.
No substantive discussion of the merits of the petition or the underlying dispute is provided in the order.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
Dismissal: The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
Pending Applications: The order directs that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
No specific corrective actions or future compliance obligations are imposed on either party beyond the disposal of pending applications.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court’s final decision is to dismiss the Special Leave Petition, thereby upholding the High Court’s earlier judgment.
The dismissal is enforceable immediately, and no further procedural steps are required from the parties.
