Case Details

  • Case Name / Petition: Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27534/2025
  • Parties: M/S TARINI PRASAD MOHANTY (Petitioner) vs M/S SUNFLAG IRON AND STEEL COMPANY LTD. (Respondent)
  • Court / Authority: Supreme Court of India, Court No.3, Item No.1501, Section XI‑A
  • Case/Order No.: Not explicitly stated beyond petition number
  • Date of Judgment: 27‑05‑2026 (digitally signed at 17:19:25 IST)
  • Origin: Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12‑08‑2025 in WA No. 629/2025 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack
  • Period of Violation / Dispute: Not specified in the order

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: M/S TARINI PRASAD MOHANTY
  • Respondent: M/S SUNFLAG IRON AND STEEL COMPANY LTD.
  • Petitioner’s Counsel: Mr. Shashank Garg (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Divyakant Lahoti (AOR), Ms. Praveena Bisht (Adv.), Mr. Siddharth Tripathi (Adv.), Ms. Aaradhya Chaturvedi (Adv.), Mr. Prithviraj Oberoi (Adv.), Mr. Kartik Lahoti (Adv.), Ms. Vindhya Mehra (Adv.), Mr. K Vinayakam Gupta (Adv.), Ms. Samridhi Bhatt (Adv.), Ms. Shreya Gokel (Adv.), Ms. Akanksha Soni (Adv.), Ms. Shubheksha Dwivedi (Adv.)
  • Respondent’s Counsel: Mr. Gopal Subramanium (Sr. Adv.), Mr. N K Mody (Sr. Adv.), Ms. Malvika Trivedi (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Gaurav Juneja (Adv.), Ms. Swastika Chakravarti (Adv.), Ms. Mimansha Durgapal (Adv.), Mr. Vasant Rajasekaran (Adv.), Mr. Dhananjay Mishra (Adv.), Mr. Harshvardhan Korada (Adv.), Mr. Sidhanth Juyal (Adv.), Ms. Gauri Subramanium (Adv.), Mr. Ankit Malhotra (Adv.), Mr. Joel S George (Adv.), Mr. Shailendra Slaria (Adv.), Ms. Ishita (Adv.), M/s Khaitan & Co. (AOR)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petition sought special leave to appeal against the High Court of Orissa’s judgment dated 12‑08‑2025 in WA No. 629/2025. Specific substantive issues or alleged violations are not detailed in the Supreme Court order.

Findings & Observations

  • The Bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari, granted special leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal.
  • No substantive reasoning or legal analysis is provided in the excerpt; the order simply records the disposition.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No order as to costs was made.
  • The judgment directs that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No specific corrective actions or future compliance obligations are stipulated beyond the disposal of pending applications.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed.
  • Costs: No order as to costs.
  • Further Directions: Pending applications, if any, are to be disposed of.
  • Signature: Digitally signed by Gulshan Kumar Arora, Deputy Registrar, on 27‑05‑2026.