Case Name: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. M/s Karnataka Bank Ltd.
Petition: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18972/2026.
Origin: Arising from impugned final judgment and order dated 21‑08‑2025 in ITA No. 165/2024 of the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru.
Court: Supreme Court of India.
Date of Hearing: 25‑05‑2026.
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan.
Relevant Application: IA No. 156691/2026 – Condonation of delay in filing.
Parties Involved
Petitioner: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (representing the Income Tax Department).
Respondent: M/s Karnataka Bank Ltd.
Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. N Venkataraman (A.S.G.), Mr. Sudarshan Lamba (AOR), Mr. V Chandrashekhara Bharathi (Adv.), Mr. Padmesh Mishra (Adv.), Mr. Udit Dedhiya (Adv.), Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor (Adv.), Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya (Adv.).
The petitioner sought condonation of delay in filing Income Tax Assessment (IA) No. 156691/2026 and challenged the High Court’s order dated 21‑08‑2025.
The core allegation pertained to whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the High Court’s decision under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court observed that there was no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order/judgment of the High Court.
The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 136 and concluded that the High Court’s order was substantively sound.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
Delay Condoned: The Court formally condoned the delay in filing IA No. 156691/2026.
No Monetary Penalty: No financial penalty, fine, or disgorgement was imposed on either party.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The Court did not prescribe any specific corrective measures beyond the condonation of delay.
No additional compliance directives were issued to Karnataka Bank Ltd or the Income Tax Department.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18972/2026 stands dismissed.
The order of the High Court dated 21‑08‑2025 remains effective.
Any pending applications, if existent, are ordered to stand disposed of.
The judgment is enforceable as per the Supreme Court’s authority, with no further action required from the parties.