Case Details

  • Case Name: Contempt Petition (C) No.45/2023 in C.A. No.402/2022
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma (Partial Court Working Days Bench)
  • Hearing Date: 03-06-2026
  • Petitioners: Aquacity Consumer and Social Welfare Society
  • Respondents: Hemant Kumar Soni & Ors.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners represented by: Mr. Rahul Kaushik (Senior Advocate), Mr. Vivek Kumar, Mr. Avani Sharma, Mr. Akshay Srivastava, AOR; Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR.
  • Respondents represented by: Mr. Puneet Jain (Senior Advocate), Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR.
  • Additional Solicitor General: Ms. Archana Pathak Dave (present in Court).
  • Others: Jatinder Kaur (digitally signed payment confirmation), Sudhir Kumar Sharma (P.S. to Registrar).

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Alleged contempt for failure to pay dues to 28 petitioners.
  • Payment of principal amounts claimed to be completed; interest for five petitioners remains unpaid but petitioners waive the amount.
  • Request for auction of two respondent properties alleged to be owned by respondents.

Findings & Observations

  • Court recorded that principal amounts have been paid to all 28 petitioners via the demand drafts listed (see table).
  • No dispute on interest for five petitioners; petitioners have chosen to forego the small unpaid amount.
  • Two properties identified for possible auction: (i) Hospital plot in Akriti Aqua City, 1528 sq m, government value Rs 3,05,60,000; (ii) Recreation plot in Akriti Highlands, 2000 sq m, government value Rs 2,40,000.
  • Court sought clarification from Income Tax Department on feasibility of auction.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Order to re‑list the contempt petition on 04-06-2026 to consider auction of the two properties.
  • Respondents to file an affidavit confirming the properties are free from encumbrances and no pending proceedings.
  • Additional Solicitor General to obtain instructions from the Income Tax Department regarding auction feasibility.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Filing of affidavit by any one respondent on the day of the order.
  • Compliance with any directions issued by the Income Tax Department concerning the auction.
  • Interest waiver for five petitioners as per their election.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Court’s order mandates re‑listing, potential auction of the specified properties, and affidavit filing, thereby enforcing compliance with the contempt decree.