Case Details

  • Case Name / Reference: Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.21063‑21064/2026 and Criminal SLP No.10985/2026.
  • Court / Authority: Supreme Court of India.
  • Order / Judgment Date: Order dated 09‑06‑2026 (digitally signed by Ms. Neha Gupta); hearing held on 08‑06‑2026.
  • Impugned Judgment: High Court of Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri, judgment and order dated 22‑05‑2026 (FMAT No.4/2026, CAN No.1/2026).
  • Period of Dispute: Not specified in the order.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Mukesh Kumar Agarwal.
  • Respondents: Merico Tea Estates Limited & Others.
  • Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Mr. Jatin Kumar, Ms. Rashmi Kumari, Mr. Kunal Mimani, Mr. Parag Chaturvedi, Mr. Mranal Prajapati (all of Dharmaprabhas Law Associates).
  • Advocate‑on‑Record (AOR): Mr. Krishna Ballabh Thakur (accepted notice on behalf of all respondents).
  • Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petitioners sought Special Leave to Appeal against the High Court’s May 22, 2026 judgment favoring the respondents.
  • The petition also included a request for exemption from filing certain documents (C/C of the impugned judgment and O.T.).
  • A related criminal SLP (No.10985/2026) was filed and tagged along with the civil SLPs.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court accepted notice on behalf of the respondents through AOR Mr. Krishna Ballabh Thakur.
  • No substantive merits of the appeal were discussed; the order primarily addresses procedural directions and interim relief.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Stay Order: A stay was imposed on the impugned High Court judgment and order dated 22‑May‑2026.
  • Document Filing: Respondents must place a counter‑affidavit on record within four weeks from the date of the order.
  • Rejoinder: Any rejoinder affidavit, if filed, must be submitted before the next hearing date.
  • Adjournment: Both learned counsels assured the Court that they will adjourn the civil suit pending between the parties.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Respondents are required to file the counter‑affidavit within the stipulated four‑week period.
  • Rejoinder affidavit, if any, to be filed before the next scheduled hearing.
  • The civil suit between the parties must be adjourned as directed.
  • The matter is listed for further hearing and disposal on 03‑08‑2026.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court stayed the High Court’s May 22, 2026 judgment pending final disposal of the SLPs.
  • Procedural compliance (counter‑affidavit, possible rejoinder, adjournment of civil suit) is mandatory.
  • The case will be heard again on 03‑08‑2026, where further orders may be issued.