Authority: Calcutta High Court

Order Date: 16 September 2026

Case Overview

  • Plaintiff: Sushil Kumar Purohit, President of Shree Ramdeo Pustikar Mandal.
  • Advocate for plaintiff: Mr. Avijit Ghoshal.
  • The suit was an originating summons filed under CSOS/1/2026.
  • The plaintiff sought relief but the plaint was found to lack essential particulars: names of creditors, amounts owed, dates of claim emergence, whether demand was made, status of claim as stale, and detailed description and tentative valuation of the property intended for sale.
  • The advocate argued that these facts could not be added via a supplementary affidavit and would require amendment, which was deemed cumbersome; therefore, he requested withdrawal with liberty to re‑file.

Final Outcome

  • The Court dismissed the originating summons suit as withdrawn.
  • The plaintiff was granted liberty to file a fresh suit on the same cause, subject to legal permissibility.

Topics: Civil Procedure, Court Order