Authority: High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad

Order Date: 28 September 2026

Case Overview

  • The matter involves a large group of writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 9797, 9798, 9820, 10014, 10058, 10074, 10158, 10159, 10220, 10232, 10234, 10248, 10250, 10282, 10284, 10297, 10399, 10421, 11554, 11555, 11905, 11925, 12039, 12106, 12229, 12530, 12755, 12821, 12834, 12835, 12891, 12892, 12893, 12901, 12905, 14280, 15459, 15573, 15719, 15720, 15721, 15724, 15725, 15726, 15727, 15728, 15788, 15799, 15886, 16482, 16520, 16521, 16809, 16892, 16993 and 18724 of 2023) that arise from a common order passed by the Special Tribunal, Ranga Reddy District, in case No. F3/37/2022 dated 16 March 2023.
  • The writ petitioners are respondents before the Special Tribunal; the petitioners in the High Court include M/s. Triaxes Batteries LLP (appearing through counsel Mr. K. Kiran Kumar) and other parties.
  • Applications I.A.No.1 of 2026 were filed to implead M/s. Silverline Properties Estates, a Limited Liability Partnership Firm, Narsingi Village, Ranga Reddy, represented by its authorised signatory Sri Tadisina Sunil Reddy, as respondent No.24 in all the listed writ petitions.
  • Senior Counsel Sri H. Venugopal, appearing for Silverline, stated that several writ petitioners and respondents have settled their disputes out of court and sought referral to the High Court Legal Services Committee to record the compromise.
  • Counsel for Triaxes Batteries LLP opposed the implead applications, filing counter‑affidavits.
  • The court, after reviewing the affidavits, held that allowing the implead would not impede any party’s rights and ordered the Registry to amend the cause titles accordingly.
  • Separate applications I.A.No.2 of 2026 (in W.P.9797) and I.A.No.1 of 2026 (in W.P.12755) sought to implead the same petitioner, but the court dismissed them, observing that agreements of sale dated 23‑05‑2014 and mortgage deeds dated 28‑06‑2014 cannot be a basis to claim rights over the properties, and therefore the petitioner was not a necessary party.
  • The court noted that some writ petitioners and respondents, including Silverline Properties Estates, have entered into a compromise and settled the matter out of court.
  • Consequently, the court directed that the case file be transmitted immediately to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for identification of parties and their counsels and to record the voluntariness of the compromise.
  • Parties were ordered to appear before the Committee on or before 01 Oct 2026 at 11:00 A.M., with the Secretary of the Committee to record the compromise and submit a report to the court before the next hearing date. A list of parties was to be filed on 05 Oct 2026.

Final Outcome

  • Implead applications I.A.No.1 of 2026 were allowed, and the cause titles will be amended to include Silverline Properties Estates LLP as respondent No.24.
  • Implead applications I.A.No.2 of 2026 in W.P.9797 and I.A.No.1 of 2026 in W.P.12755 were dismissed.
  • The matter is referred to the High Court Legal Services Committee for recording of the compromise, with a mandated appearance on 01 Oct 2026 and a reporting deadline before the next hearing.

Topics: Court Proceedings, Impleadment, Compromise Recording