Case: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6436/2024
Parties: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana & ORS. (Petitioner) vs. M/s Elifecycle Management (P) Limited (Respondent)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 19‑05‑2026
Origin: Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19‑12‑2023 in WA No. 1152/2023 passed by the High Court for The State of Telangana at Hyderabad
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana (TGSPDCL)
Respondent: Elifecycle Management Private Limited
Respondent Representative: Mohit Kumar Vanamala, Director & COO (author of the letter dated 08‑04‑2026)
Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Sravan Kumar Karanam, AOR; Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Adv.; Mr. P. Venkatraju, Adv.; Ms. Sushmitha M., Adv.
Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Roshan Santhalia, AOR; Mr. Shivansh Sinha, Adv.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petitioner sought relief concerning the release of an electricity connection at the respondent’s original site (Sy. No. 468‑472, Chegur Village, Kothur Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana‑509215).
Respondent alleged that the connection could not be released because the landlord had outstanding dues to TGSPDCL.
Respondent informed the court that it no longer required the connection at the original site and had shifted operations to a new premises (Sy. No. 8/A, Kodicherla Village, Kothur Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana‑509228).
Respondent requested the court to note the change of address and to release the electricity connection for the new premises.
Findings & Observations
The Court accepted the letter dated 08‑04‑2026, digitally signed by NIDHI AHUJA, on record.
The Court observed that the respondent does not require the electricity connection at the original site and has relocated to a new premises.
No substantive legal question on liability or breach was adjudicated; the Court left the question of law open for future consideration.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
No monetary penalties, fines, or settlements were imposed.
The Court directed that the letter be taken on record and that the respondent’s request for release of electricity connection at the new premises be noted.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Respondent is expected to comply with TGSPDCL’s procedures for obtaining electricity connection at the new premises.
No further compliance directives or reporting obligations were issued by the Court.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6436/2024.
All pending applications, including those for admission, condonation of delay, and permission to file additional documents, were also disposed of.
The substantive legal question remains open for future determination.
