Case name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10370/2026
Parties: State of Rajasthan & ORS (Petitioner) vs Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskruti Sewa Sansthan (Respondent)
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Case/Order No.: Not explicitly stated; order dated 27‑05‑2026
Date of order: 27‑05‑2026 (digital signature timestamp)
Period of violation/dispute: Relates to mining lease and LOI operations challenged in High Court judgment dated 20‑Jan‑2026
Parties Involved
Petitioners: State of Rajasthan & ORS
Respondent: Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskruti Sewa Sansthan
Counsel for Petitioners: Dr. Manish Singhvi (Sr. Adv), Apurv Singhvi, Shalini Haldar, Jitesh Saluja, D. K. Devesh, R. Venkataramani, Vikramjeet Banerjee, Shiv Mangal Sharma, Saurabh Rajpal, Arushi Rathore, etc.
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
Issues / Allegations / Violations
Petition challenges the High Court’s order dated 20‑Jan‑2026 concerning continuation of mining activities under existing mining leases and Letters‑of‑Intent (LOI).
Allegation that mining lease holders and LOI holders should not continue operations pending resolution of the dispute.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court found sufficient grounds to entertain the petition and therefore granted special leave.
The Court observed that ongoing mining operations could prejudice the matters before it and thus ordered a halt.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
Permission granted to file the Special Leave Petition.
Delay in filing was condoned.
Notice to be issued to the opposite party.
Mining operations shall not be carried on by the mining lease holders as well as by the LOI holders.
The special leave petitions are to be re‑listed for hearing in the week commencing 20 July 2026.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
All mining activities by the lease and LOI holders must cease immediately.
Respondent must comply with the notice and appear before the Court on the re‑listed date.
No further filing restrictions beyond the condoned delay are imposed.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court’s order is final and enforceable; non‑compliance with the cessation directive may attract contempt proceedings.
The matter will proceed on the re‑listed date as directed by the Court.