Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 13-10-2026

Case Overview

  • Parties: Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (Petitioner) vs. Urban Infrastructure Trustees Limited & ANR (Respondents).
  • Proceedings: Miscellaneous applications No. 304, Court No.5, Section IX‑A, arising from the impugned final judgment and order dated 05‑08‑2025 in SLP(C) Nos.18578‑18579/2025.
  • Counsel: For petitioner – Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Nakul Dewan and a team of junior counsels. For respondents – Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul and a team of junior counsels.
  • Reliefs Sought: Clarification that the 05‑08‑2025 order required the learned Arbitrator to decide the four questions of law at the preliminary stage and to decide them in the context of the petitioner's assertions, not merely on the Respondent’s Statement of Claim (SOC).
  • Court’s Observations:

1. The original order (05‑08‑2025) had directed the Arbitrator to consider four specific questions of law before proceeding to a final award.

2. The core controversy is whether the Trust has stood extinguished.

3. The Arbitrator’s award dated 08‑05‑2026 left the extinguishment issue open for determination at the final stage, contrary to the Supreme Court’s earlier direction.

4. Paragraph 52 of the Arbitrator’s award noted the existence of the Trust as contested; paragraph 53 questioned the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to consider a defence; paragraph 76 kept the jurisdictional issue open and linked it to the threshold maintainability of a Section 11 application.

  • Court’s Direction:
  • The petitioner must file a comprehensive statement of defence, together with all supporting documents, within four weeks from the order date.
  • One copy of the statement of defence shall be served on the respondents.
  • Upon receipt, the Arbitrator shall be instructed to hear both sides on the four preliminary questions and give a specific finding on whether the Trust has been extinguished.
  • If the Arbitrator finds the Trust not extinguished, the arbitration will proceed on remaining issues.
  • If the Arbitrator finds the Trust extinguished, an appropriate order shall be passed in accordance with law.
  • The respondent’s counsel raised a reservation that the core issue may also involve the Shareholders’ Agreement (SHA), which the Arbitrator will consider.
  • Disposition: The miscellaneous applications are disposed of; any pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

Final Outcome

  • The Supreme Court clarified that the Arbitrator must decide the four preliminary questions, especially the extinguishment of the Trust, before the final award.
  • The petitioner is ordered to submit a detailed statement of defence within four weeks.
  • The Arbitrator is directed to render a specific finding on the Trust’s status and then proceed accordingly.

Topics: Arbitration, Trust Law