Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 12‑Oct‑2026

Case Overview

  • Petition: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 46912/2026, arising from the impugned final judgment and order dated 11‑May‑2026 in FAO‑COM No. 3/2026 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh.
  • Parties: Rohit Sawhney (Petitioner) vs. Mega Mall Condominium Association & Anr. (Respondent).
  • Interim Applications: IA No. 304421/2026 – condonation of delay in refiling/curing defects; IA No. 304425/2026 – exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Jayant Mehta (Senior Advocate) and a team of advocates.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Not listed.
  • Observations: Senior counsel drew the Court’s attention to paragraph 8 of the impugned order, stating that the petitioner had not consented to the order proposed by the High Court.
  • Additional Reference: A copy of an order dated 12‑Aug‑2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, Commercial Court at Gurugram, granting an injunction in favour of the petitioner subject to the deposit of a certain amount.

Order

1. Delay in refiling/curing defects is condoned.

2. The Court notes the senior counsel’s objection to paragraph 8 of the impugned order.

2.1. The Court acknowledges the order dated 12‑Aug‑2026 granting an injunction to the petitioner, subject to a deposit.

3. Issue notice; the notice shall be returnable on 06‑Jan‑2027.

4. The Court directs that there shall be no restrain on the petitioner for accessing the suit property.

Final Outcome

  • The Supreme Court condoned the procedural delay, ordered issuance of a notice with a return date of 06‑Jan‑2027, affirmed the injunction granted by the Additional District Judge, and prohibited any restrain on the petitioner’s access to the suit property.

Topics: Legal Proceedings, Injunction, Real Estate Dispute