Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 15 September 2026
Case Overview
- Petition: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 44239/2026 filed by Shri Vithal Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. against Pitambar Narayan Gaidhane & Anr., arising from the impugned final judgment and order dated 16 April 2026 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, in Writ Petition No.6319 of 2025.
- Interlocutory applications: IA No. 240029/2026 (condonation of delay), IA No. 240023/2026 (exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment), IA No. 240026/2026 (exemption from filing O.T.).
- Hearing date: 10 September 2026 before a bench of Hon’ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan.
- Representation: Petitioner's counsel – M/S Juristrust Law Offices, AOR; Respondent No.1/Caveator counsel – Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR; Mr. P. Roy Chaudhari, Adv.; Mrs. Vandna Beri, Adv.; Mr. Nitin Prabhakar, Adv.
Final Outcome
- The Court condoned the delay in filing the interlocutory application.
- The Special Leave Petition is disposed of, with the Court reserving liberty to the petitioner to apply for vacating the interim order granted by the Appellate Tribunal, noting that the main appeal is still pending adjudication.
- The Court directed that if such an application is filed, the Appellate Tribunal should either dispose of the main appeal expeditiously or vacate the stay and dispose of the main appeal as appropriate.
- The Court observed that implementation of the interim order would effectively grant the main relief to the respondents; therefore, pending applications are deemed disposed of.
Topics: Legal Procedure, Supreme Court Order