Supreme Court Dismisses Andhra Mahila SLP

Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 27-10-2026

Parties: Petitioners – Andhra Mahila Sabha Trust & Others; Respondents – Lakshmi Murthy & Others.
Origin: The petitions (SLP (C) No. 36802/2026) arise from the impugned final judgment and order dated 15‑09‑2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras (OSA No. 146/2026).
Nature of Proceeding: Petition for special leave to appeal against the High Court order granting leave to sue under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Counsel: Petitioners were represented by senior advocates S. Niranjan Reddy, Sidharth Luthra, Shloka Narayanan, Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, Arpit Kumar Mishra, Sagarika Singh, Vishnu Kanth Mundada, and Shrey Nautiyal. No counsel listed for respondents.
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan.
Key Legal Question: Whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the High Court’s order granting leave to sue under CPC Section 92.

The Court found no good reason to interfere with the leave‑to‑sue order, while expressly stating that any observation in that order shall not have any bearing on the merits of the case.
Consequently, the special leave petitions were dismissed.
The Court ordered that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Topics: Legal Proceedings, Civil Procedure