Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 06-07-2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioner: M/s Artec Advertising
  • Respondents: The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation & Ors.
  • Petition: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 4222/2026, arising out of the impugned final judgment and order dated 11‑03‑2025 in WP No. 38811/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
  • Interim Applications (IA): IA No. 183091/2026 (condonation of delay in filing IA No. 183092/2026), IA No. 183087/2026 (exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment), IA No. 183089/2026 (exemption from filing O.T.).
  • Hearing Date: 01‑07‑2026, before a Partial Court Working Days Bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sheel Nagu.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv.; Ms. Adviteeya, Adv.; Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv., Advocate on Record (AOR).
  • Counsel for Respondent(s): Not listed in the record.

Order

  • The Court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
  • The Court stated: “We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.”
  • The Special Leave Petition is dismissed both on the grounds of delay as well as on merits.

Signature

  • Digitally signed by Sweta Balodi on 2026.07.06 (Signature Not Verified).
  • Names appearing on the signature line: (SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID), ASTT. Registrar‑cum‑PS Assistant Registrar.

Final Outcome

  • The petition filed by M/s Artec Advertising is rejected; the High Court’s order dated 11‑03‑2025 remains in force.

Topics: Legal; Court Decision