Case Details
- Case Name: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 10709/2026
- Parties: T. Mannan (Petitioner) vs. Christal & Ors. (Respondents)
- Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Partial Court Working Days Bench
- Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva
- Case/Order No.: Diary No(s). 10709/2026
- Date of Order: 02‑06‑2026
- Originating Judgment: High Court of Judicature at Madras, A(CAD) No. 6/2025 dated 23‑06‑2025
- Period of Dispute: Issues pertain to interlocutory applications filed after the High Court judgment
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: T. Mannan, represented by Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja (Advocate), Mr. Anish R. Shah (Advocate), and AOR Mr. Ankit Sahu
- Respondent(s): Christal & Ors.
- Regulatory/Judicial Body: High Court of Judicature at Madras (original adjudicator)
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- Petition sought:
1. Condonation of delay in filing IA No. 158321/2026
2. Condonation of delay in refiling/curing defects IA No. 158327/2026
3. Exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment IA No. 158323/2026
- The underlying contention was against the High Court’s final judgment and order dated 23‑06‑2025.
Findings & Observations
- The Supreme Court observed that it is not inclined to interfere with the High Court’s judgment and order.
- The Court found no merit to set aside the lower court’s decision.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- Delay Condoned: The Court condoned the filing delay for the mentioned interlocutory applications.
- Dismissal: The Special Leave Petition is dismissed in its entirety.
- Pending Applications: Any pending interlocutory applications, if existent, shall stand disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- No further corrective measures were directed beyond the disposal of pending applications.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The order dated 02‑06‑2026 is effective immediately.
- The petition is dismissed; the High Court’s judgment remains operative.