Case Name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17903/2026
Petitioners: Mushikam Ranjeeth Kumar
Respondents: The Territory Manager BPCL Retail & Ors.
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order/Case No.: Not specified
Date of Order: 25-05-2026 (hearing date)
Period of dispute: Not specified
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Mushikam Ranjeeth Kumar
Respondent: The Territory Manager BPCL Retail & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey (AOR), Mr. D. Shiva Shankar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Rajshri A. Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Mr. Amit P. Shahi, Adv. Mr. Sunandan Mishra, Adv. Mr. H.B. Dubey
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
Issues / Allegations / Violations
Petition challenges the High Court order dated 06‑04‑2026 in WA No. 218/2026 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana concerning BPCL Retail.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court observed that it is not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition and therefore dismissed it.
The Court indicated that the pending writ petition should be decided on its merits by the Writ Court, without influence from the impugned order.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
Any pending applications, if existent, are ordered to be disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The Writ Court is directed to consider the pending writ petition on its merits independently of the dismissed SLP.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The SLP is dismissed; no further relief is granted.
The order disposes of any pending applications and leaves the pending writ petition for the Writ Court to adjudicate.
