Case Details

  • Petition: Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19271/2026
  • Origin: Impugned final judgment and order dated 30‑07‑2025 in Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025 (High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru)
  • Interim Application: IA No. 118682/2026 – Condonation of delay in filing
  • Hearing Date: 26‑05‑2026 (Supreme Court of India)
  • Order Date (digital signature): 27‑05‑2026 15:08:03 IST
  • Related Matter: SLP(C) No. 8624/2026 (dismissed on 27‑02‑2026) concerning the same Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: State Project Director
  • Respondent: Mycon Construction Ltd.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Prateek Chadha (A.A.G.), Mr. Sanchit Garga (AOR), Mr. Kunal Rana, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Sreekar Aechuri, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Soni, Adv. Mr. Aniket Chauhaan
  • Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Balaji Subramanian, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Nath, AOR Mr. Asjad Hussain, Adv. Mr. Anunay Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Akash Kundu
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petition sought condonation of delay and relief from the High Court’s order that was based on Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025.
  • The petitioner argued that the High Court’s reliance on the Commercial Appeal should be revisited.
  • The underlying Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025 had already been the subject of SLP(C) No. 8624/2026, which the Supreme Court dismissed on 27‑02‑2026.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court noted that the High Court’s order referred to Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025.
  • Since SLP(C) No. 8624/2026 (pertaining to the same Commercial Appeal) was dismissed, the Supreme Court was not inclined to entertain the present petition.
  • The Court therefore dismissed the Special Leave Petition.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties were imposed.
  • Directions:

1. Delay in filing is condoned.

2. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

3. Any pending applications, if any, are disposed of.

4. Any question of law, if raised, is left open for future consideration.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No specific corrective actions were mandated beyond the dismissal of the petition.
  • The Court left the door open for any future question of law to be raised.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The petition filed by the State Project Director is dismissed.
  • The order of the High Court (Commercial Appeal No. 133/2025) stands, given the dismissal of the related SLP(C) No. 8624/2026.
  • The matter is concluded with the condonation of delay and disposal of any pending applications.