Authority: Supreme Court of India (Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta)
Order Date: 14‑07‑2026
Case Overview
- Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 5144/2023, arising from the High Court judgment dated 07‑02‑2023 in WP No. 6728/2021.
- Petitioner: Maharashtra Periwala Kranti Mahasangh; Respondents: Pimpri‑Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and others.
- Counsel for petitioner: Mr. Zain Haider, Adv.; Mr. Umesh Kumar, Adv.; Ms. Puja Sharma, AOR. Counsel for respondents included Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR; Mr. Aditya S. Jadhav, Adv.; Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv.; Mr. Vignesh Singh, Adv.; Ms. Apurva, Adv.; Mr. Dere Kishor Shankar, Adv.; Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv.; Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.; Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR; Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv.; Mr. K.m.nataraj, A.S.G.; Ms. Madhulika Upadhyay, AOR; Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv.; Mr. Siddhath Dharamadhikari, Adv.; Mr. Santosh Kr., Adv.; Mr. Jitender Kr.tripathi, Adv.; Ms. Alabhaya Dhamija, Adv.; Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR.
- The Court, after hearing, noted that this is the last opportunity for respondents to file a compliance report.
Final Outcome
- Respondents must file the compliance report by the next date; failure will trigger appropriate coercive orders.
- If the compliance report is filed, the Municipal Commissioner of Pimpri‑Chinchwad Municipal Corporation shall not be required to appear personally before the Court.
- If the report is not filed, the Municipal Commissioner shall be required to appear before the Court.
- The next list is scheduled for 04‑08‑2026.
Topics: Legal Compliance, Municipal Governance