Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Shreeyash U. Lalit, Adv.; Mr. Md. Anas Chaudhary, Adv.; Mr. Mohd. Sharyab Ali, Adv.; Ms. Shehla Chaudhary, Adv.; Ms. Alia Bano Zaidi, Adv.; Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR.
The Tribunal’s direction 22(ii) ordered that the amount deposited from Mr. Chadha’s account (post‑dated cheques not honored) be refunded to Respondent No. 1.
The appellant seeks an ex‑parte stay of that direction and permission to file an appeal, contending that the direction is unjust.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to file the appeal.
The Court directed that notice be issued on the application for condonation of delay and on the appeal.
The Court stayed the Tribunal’s direction 22(ii) pending disposal of the appeal.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
No monetary penalty imposed.
Direction 22(ii) (refund order) is stayed until the appeal is disposed.
The order was digitally signed by Babita Pandey (signature not verified).
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The appellant must file the appeal as permitted.
Notice to be issued on condonation of delay application and on the appeal.
The stay on direction 22(ii) remains effective until final disposal.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
Permission to file appeal granted.
Notice to be issued; stay on refund direction upheld pending appeal outcome.
