Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).19583‑19584/2026 arising from impugned final judgment dated 24‑01‑2026 in SBCRP No. 12/2023 and SBCRP No. 273/2022 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur.
Supreme Court of India, Item No.69 Court No.14 Section XV, hearing date 29‑05‑2026.
SLP(Criminal) No. 9401/2026 (II) listed; related IA numbers: 154885/2026 (exemption from filing), 154887/2026 (permission to file lengthy list of dates), 154883/2026 (permission to place additional facts and grounds).
High Court order dated 16‑12‑2024 had granted an interim order, which is now vacated by the impugned order.
Separate proceeding: Complaint Case No. 40 of 2024 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Boko, Kamrup (Assam) is stayed till next hearing.
Parties Involved
Petitioner: M/S ANONDITA HEALTHCARE & ANR.
Counsel for petitioner: Senior Advocate Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. K Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Rahul Singh, Mr. Nishant Shokeen (AOR), Ms. Sumita Singh, Ms. Deepika Kalia, Mr. Yash Bhardwaj, Ms. Ojaswani Dixit, Mr. Sudeep Chandra, Ms. Khushi, Mr. Parth Yadav (AOR), Mr. P B Suresh (Senior Advocate), Mr. Parth Yadav, Ms. Mani Munjal, Mr. Mayank Tomar.
Respondent No.1: Faiz Mohammad & Ors.
Respondent No.2: Unnamed party (notice to be issued formally).
Counsel for Respondent(s): Mr. P B Suresh (Senior Advocate) appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2; Mr. Parth Yadav (AOR); Ms. Mani Munjal (Advocate).
Additional Advocate: Mr. Dhruv Dwivedi (AOR) listed.
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petitioner challenges the vacating of the High Court’s interim order dated 16‑12‑2024.
Underlying dispute relates to matters previously adjudicated in SBCRP No. 12/2023 and SBCRP No. 273/2022, though specific allegations are not detailed in the order.
The stay of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2024 indicates a related criminal/compliance issue pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Boko, Kamrup (Assam).
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court observed that the High Court’s interim order has been vacated; no further substantive reasoning is provided in the excerpt.
No explicit findings on liability or merit of the petition are recorded in this order.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
1. Issue notice to Respondent No.2.
2. Formal notice to be issued to Respondent No.1.
3. Matter listed for further hearing on 17‑08‑2026.
4. Stay the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2024 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Boko, Kamrup (Assam) until the next hearing date.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Parties must comply with the issuance of notices as directed.
The stay order requires the Judicial Magistrate’s court to refrain from proceeding with Complaint Case No. 40 of 2024 until further order.
Both parties are to appear before the Supreme Court on the scheduled date of 17‑08‑2026 for continuation of the SLP proceedings.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court’s order, dated 29‑05‑2026, sets procedural directions: notice issuance, formal notice, listing of matter for 17‑08‑2026, and stay of the related complaint case.
No substantive judgment on the merits of the petition is rendered at this stage; the matter proceeds to further hearing as ordered.
