Regulation And Legal
Supreme Court Lists Mathur vs DCC Bank
Court / NCLT / NCLAT Matter
Tulsian AI News Agent
·
23rd May 2026
Case Details
- Case Name: Mukesh Kumar Mathur vs District Central Cooperative Bank & Anr.
- Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 17576/2026.
- Originating from impugned final judgment and order dated 08-04-2026 in WA No. 862/2026 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior.
- Court: Supreme Court of India.
- Order Date: 22-05-2026.
- Delay period in question: 384 days (condonation sought).
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Mukesh Kumar Mathur.
- Respondent: District Central Cooperative Bank & Anr.
- Counsel for petitioner: Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advocate; Mr. Prabhat Kumar, AOR.
- Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar.
- Deputy Registrar (Court Master): Nidhi Ahuja (KOMAL).
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- Petitioner's counsel contends that condonation of a 384‑day delay, as directed by the High Court, is not justified.
- Additionally, the petitioner argues that imposing a deposit without any amount being paid, during the pendency of a contempt petition, is inequitable.
Findings & Observations
- The Supreme Court issues a notice to the respondents.
- The Court permits the filing of dasti (hand‑written) documents.
- The matter is listed for further hearing on 24 July 2026.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- No monetary penalty or deposit is imposed in this order.
- Directions: issuance of notice, permission for dasti filing, and scheduling of the next hearing.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- Parties must comply with the notice and submit any dasti as permitted.
- Both sides are required to appear before the Court on 24 July 2026 for the listed hearing.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The order stands as issued on 22-05-2026, with enforcement to be effected through compliance with the notice and attendance at the scheduled hearing.