Case Details

  • Case name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 9272/2024
  • Parties: Anshul Siroya (Petitioner) vs M/s Phillips India Ltd & Ors. (Respondents)
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar
  • Order No.: Not specified (record of proceedings)
  • Date of Order: 02‑06‑2026
  • Period of violation/dispute: Not specified

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners: Anshul Siroya; Senior Counsel: Mr. K. Paari Vendhan (AOR), Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Ms. Devanshi Sancheti
  • Respondents:
  • Respondent No.1: M/s Phillips India Ltd (has filed counter‑affidavit)
  • Respondent No.2: Unidentified party, address unknown for past 8‑10 years
  • Respondent No.3: Unserved party, no fresh particulars filed
  • Respondent No.4: Service completed on 28‑Feb‑2025, no appearance entered
  • Registrar: Sh. Apurv Singh

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Failure to serve notice on Respondent No.2 due to unknown address.
  • Failure of petitioner’s senior counsel to file fresh particulars for Respondent No.2 within one‑week extension.
  • Failure to serve Respondent No.3 despite previous opportunity.
  • Respondent No.4 served but has not entered appearance.

Findings & Observations

  • Registrar notes that Respondent No.1 has already filed a counter‑affidavit.
  • Service report confirms Respondent No.2’s address is unknown; therefore fresh service steps are required.
  • Service on Respondent No.4 was completed on 28‑Feb‑2025, yet no appearance has been entered.
  • Petitioner's senior counsel has not taken fresh steps for Respondent No.3 despite the granted opportunity.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties imposed.
  • Senior counsel for petitioner granted one week to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars for Respondent No.2.
  • Petitioner's counsel instructed to file fresh particulars for Respondent No.3; failure to do so leads to matter being listed before a Judge.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Petitioner's senior counsel must file fresh particulars regarding service on Respondent No.2 within one week of the order.
  • Petitioner's counsel must file fresh particulars concerning Respondent No.3.
  • Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Registrar ordered that the matter be listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further directions after petitioner’s counsel’s non‑compliance.
  • Copy of the record of proceedings to be furnished to the concerned Advocate‑on‑Record for information and compliance.