Case Details

  • Case name: M/s Anabond Limited vs. Deepak Nagpal
  • Petitioners: Deepak Nagpal
  • Respondents: M/s Anabond Limited
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Criminal Original Jurisdiction
  • Case/Order No.: Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 943/2025 and 1160/2025
  • Date: 25 May 2026
  • Underlying complaint numbers: C.C. No.1625/2024 & STC No.1624/2024 under Sections 138 & 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Deepak Nagpal, proprietor of M/s Deepak Motors, business located at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh.
  • Respondent: M/s Anabond Limited, corporate office in Chennai, Tamil Nadu; cheque presented through its HDFC Bank account, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai.
  • Banks: Karnataka Bank, Jabalpur Branch (drawer’s bank); HDFC Bank, Chennai (presenting bank).
  • Counsel for petitioner: B.S. Rajesh Agrajit, Siddharth Goswami, Narendra Kumar, Narednra Kumar, Akash Singh, Smriti Singh, Satya Veer Singh (AOR).
  • Counsel for respondent: Usha Nandini V. (AOR), Biju P. Raman, John Thomas Arakal, Nadana Harikrishnan, Nandana Harikrishnan.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Complaint under Sections 138 & 142 NI Act alleging dishonour of cheque.
  • Jurisdiction dispute: Respondent argues Chennai jurisdiction under Section 142(2) because cheque presented via its Chennai bank account.
  • Petitioner contends substantive nexus with Jabalpur: cheque drawn on Karnataka Bank Jabalpur, business transactions, witnesses, and records located in Jabalpur.

Findings & Observations

  • Court exercised power under Section 446 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, noting its wide amplitude to secure ends of justice.
  • Determined substantial nexus with Jabalpur: petitioner residence, business, drawer’s bank, and documentary evidence all located there.
  • Found no substantial part of the underlying transaction occurred in Chennai.
  • Applied balance of convenience: petitioner would face repeated 1400 km travel; respondent, as corporate body, can prosecute from Chennai.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties imposed.
  • Directed transfer of the two criminal cases from Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Judge), Saidapet, Chennai to First‑Class Judicial Magistrate, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh.
  • Transferee court may allow virtual presence of respondent’s representative when necessary.
  • Records to be transferred by email without delay; immediate compliance required.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Parties to comply with transfer order.
  • Transferee court to manage proceedings, including possible virtual attendance for respondent.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Transfer petitions allowed; pending applications, if any, disposed.
  • Order signed by Hon’ble Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Atul S. Chandurkar on 25 May 2026.
  • Enforcement through electronic transmission of case files to the Jabalpur court.