Counsel for Petitioner: Sr. Adv. Santosh Paul, Adv. Chirag J Shah, Adv. Utsav Trivedi, Adv. Manini Roy, Adv. Harsh Pandya, M/S. Tas Law
Counsel for Respondents: AOR Narendra Hooda, Sr. Adv. Prashant S. Kenjale, Adv. Minal Chandnani, Adv. Sanjay Borkar, Adv. Rashmi Chavan, Adv. Damini Vishwakarma, Adv. B Dhananjay, M/s Juristrust Law Offices, Adv. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande
Key Official in Affidavit: Mr. Kunal Anil Muley, Assistant Director of Town Planning, Thane Municipal Corporation
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petition sought special leave to appeal the High Court’s final judgment and order dated 20‑02‑2026 in WP No. 10024/2023.
Specific substantive issues or alleged violations are not detailed in the Supreme Court order; the focus is on the settlement compliance by respondent No.1.
Findings & Observations
The Court noted that although respondent No.2 (Nitesh Prataprai Kothari) remains unserved, the matter is deemed settled based on compliance by respondent No.1.
The affidavit dated 25‑05‑2026 submitted by Mr. Kunal Anil Muley outlines the terms of the settlement and confirms that the required compliance has been achieved.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
No monetary penalties or fines are mentioned.
Settlement terms are encapsulated in the affidavit; the order does not disclose specific financial amounts or other obligations.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Respondent No.1 must continue to adhere to the settlement terms as detailed in the affidavit.
The Court directed that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in accordance with the affidavit dated 25‑05‑2026.
All pending applications, if any, are also ordered to be disposed of.
The order is signed by the Court Master (Babita Pandey, Preeti Saxena).
