Authority: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Order Date: 22 September 2026
Case Overview
- Petitioners: Uday Network Technologies & Anr.; Respondents: Compuage Infocom Ltd. & Anr., and the State.
- Petition No.: Writ Petition No.3767 of 2026 filed in the Bombay High Court.
- Counsel for Petitioners: Mr. Akshay Patir, assisted by Jarin Doshi, Krushna Wankhade & Prateek Jain of Ranchoddas & Co.
- Counsel for Respondent No.1: Ms. Gayatri Mohite, assisted by Dhrupad Vaghani, Ashutosh Agarwal, Ashwath.
- Counsel for Respondent No.1 (Compuage Infocom Ltd.): Kumar Reddy & Ronit Doshi of Anchorstone Legal.
- Counsel for Respondent No.2 (State): Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP.
- The petition sought relief against an impugned order of issuing process; Respondent No.1 argued an alternate remedy existed.
Final Outcome
- The Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition, granting them liberty to pursue appropriate alternate proceedings.
- The petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- The Court expressly stated that it has not considered the merits of the case; all substantive contentions remain open for future adjudication.
Topics: Legal Withdrawal, Limitation Act, Court Order