Authority: High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
Order Date: 16 July 2026
Case Overview
- Petitioner: Dharam Pal Gautam filed petition (case No. 638 CWP-818-2009 (O&M)) against respondents UHBVN Ltd. and others, challenging a suspension imposed on him.
- The petitioner submitted a representation (Annexure P7) asserting that the suspension period should be treated as duty and seeking relief.
- The representation had not received any response from the respondents at the time of hearing.
- State counsel indicated that the representation would be considered and decided expeditiously, independent of the impugned order.
Final Outcome
- The Court disposed of the matter, directing the respondents to decide the representation promptly.
- If the petitioner is found entitled, the respondents are to grant the benefit forthwith.
- If the decision is adverse to the petitioner, the respondents must provide an opportunity of hearing, state reasons, and the petitioner may seek further legal redress.
Topics: Court Order, Employment Dispute