Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 07-08-2026

Case Overview

  • Parties: Union of India (Petitioner) vs. M/s Bharti Airtel Limited (Respondent).
  • IA No.: 217514/2026 – petition seeks exemption from filing copy of the impugned judgment.
  • Impugned Judgment: Final judgment and order dated 08-06-2026 in WP No.1461/2013 and WP No.2029/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G.; Mr. Anmol Chandan; Adv. Mrs. Apoorva Kurup; Adv. Ms. Medha Pushkarna; Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar; AOR Mr. Kartik Dey; Adv. Mr. Shivam Kumar; Adv. Mr. Sahil Bhalotia.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Manjul Bajpai, Adv.; Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv.; Ms. Madhavi Agarwal, Adv.; Mr. Naman Agarwal, Adv.; Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR; Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Adv.; Ms. Suman Yadav, Adv.; Ms. Nikhita Suri, Adv.; Mr. Gurudas Khurana, Adv.; Mr. Raghav Dutt, Adv.; Ms. B. Vijayalakshmi Menon, AOR.

Order

  • The Court directed that a notice be issued to the respondents.
  • Learned counsel appearing for the respondents accepted the notice.
  • Tagging of this matter with other related cases shall be considered on the next date of hearing.

Final Outcome

  • Notice issued to Bharti Airtel; the matter will proceed to further hearing with possible case tagging; no substantive decision on the merits has been rendered at this stage.

Topics: Telecom, Judicial Review