Case Details

  • Civil Appeal No. ___ of 2026 (arising out of SLP (C) No.7700 of 2026) filed by Mrs. Asmina.
  • Court: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction.
  • Order dated New Delhi, 26 May 2026.
  • Underlying proceedings: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, D.K., Mangaluru judgment dated 03-04-2024 (MVC No.399/2021) and High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 10-09-2025 (Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 4540 of 2024).

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Mrs. Asmina (claimant).
  • Respondents: Branch Manager, Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd and others (insurer).
  • Learned counsel for appellant and respondent.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Appellant challenged the High Court’s enhancement of compensation, arguing that the total award did not fully reflect a balanced and holistic assessment of her injuries and future prospects.
  • The dispute concerns adequacy of compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of income, loss of amenities, and other heads.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal (₹4,61,500) and the High Court (₹6,48,565) “does not fully reflect a balanced and holistic assessment of the petitioner's suffering and future prospects.”
  • The Court deemed it appropriate to award an additional lump‑sum compensation of ₹4,00,000.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Additional lump‑sum compensation of ₹4,00,000 to be paid over and above the amounts already granted.
  • Total compensation payable to the claimant shall stand modified as directed by the High Court, incorporating the additional award.
  • Liability to satisfy the award remains with the insurer (Respondent No. 2).

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The insurer must remit the total amount directly into the claimant’s bank account.
  • Bank account particulars to be supplied by the appellant’s counsel to the respondent’s counsel.
  • Remittance to be made within eight weeks from the date of the order.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The appeal is allowed in part; the High Court judgment is modified to include the additional ₹4,00,000 award.
  • The order is enforceable, and the insurer is directed to comply with the remittance timeline.