Authority: Supreme Court of India – Registrar (Registrar Court)
Order Date: 09-10-2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Appellant Subrata Dutta vs. Respondent Viom Networks Ltd & Ors (Respondent No.1) along with respondents No.2 to No.7.
- Nature of Proceeding: Criminal Appeal No. 2297/2026 before the Registrar of the Supreme Court.
- Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Siddharth Swain, Adv.; Ms. Ruchika Rathi (AOR); Mr. Mayank Rai, Adv.; Mr. Aatish Sharma, Adv.
- Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Atharva Koppal, Adv.; M/s Trilegal Advocates On Record; AOR Ms. Sanjana Saddy.
- Background: Respondent No.1 (Viom Networks Ltd) filed a reply. A certificate of service from the High Court indicated that the company had changed its name.
Order Details
- The Court grants the appellant a two‑week period to file an application to amend the cause title reflecting the name change of Viom Networks Ltd.
- The appellant’s counsel is directed to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars for service on respondents No.2 to No.6 within one week.
- A memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No.7 has been filed; the Vakalatnama must be filed as per procedural rules, and the opportunity to file a reply has already been declined.
- Soft copies of the original records of the High Court and Trial Court have been received; per Circular F.No.01/Judl./2025 dated 10.01.2025, these soft copies are to be provided to the parties’ counsel.
- The matter is listed again for hearing on 25.11.2026.
- A copy of this Record of Proceeding is to be furnished to the concerned Advocate‑on‑Record for information and compliance.
Final Outcome
- The Court’s order primarily extends procedural timelines, mandates service of fresh particulars, requires filing of Vakalatnama for respondent No.7, and ensures access to soft copies of prior court records, with the next hearing scheduled for 25 November 2026.
Topics: Legal Procedure, Company Name Change, Court Order