Case Details

Case Name: M/s.SS Rail Works Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s.VNR Infrastructure Limited (under liquidation)

Court/Authority: National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-II

Case Number: I.A. No.45 of 2022 in C.P.(IB).No.12/10/HDB/2017

Date of Order: 20.05.2026

Period of Dispute: Sub-contract agreement dated 18.01.2017, contract terminated on 01.07.2019

Parties Involved

Petitioner/Applicant: M/s.SS Rail Works Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Chief Executive Officer Mr.A.Srinivasulu Reddy

Respondent: M/s.VNR Infrastructure Limited (under liquidation), represented by its Liquidator Mr.T.S.N.Raja

Regulators/Judicial Members: Shri Rajeev Bhardwaj (Hon'ble Member Judicial), Shri Sanjay Puri (Hon'ble Member Technical)

Counsel: For Applicant - Mr. M. Anil Kumar; For Respondent - Ms. JVL Bharati along with Liquidator Mr.T.S.N.Raja

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The Applicant claimed ₹3,50,46,914/- as final bill amount and ₹34,21,122/- as PVC bill for subcontract works executed for North East Frontier Railway projects
  • Alleged that Liquidator received payments from NFR Authorities but failed to release corresponding amounts to Applicant in violation of Sub-Contract Agreement clauses 3 and 5
  • Claimed Liquidator cancelled Power of Attorney preventing submission of PVC bills to NFR Authorities
  • Alleged discriminatory treatment as Respondent released payments to other subcontractors (Prakash Enterprises ₹57,78,040 and Datta Supply Agency ₹1,60,00,000) without objection
  • Stated that NFR Authorities were willing to release payments if final bills and measurements were submitted by Respondent

Findings & Observations

  • The Tribunal found the application sought mandatory directions that would require adjudication of disputed facts
  • Noted that relief would require determination of measurement certification, entitlement, PVC bills, stock reconciliation, materials, equipment, royalty terms, alleged set-off, and losses from contract termination
  • Observed that connected disputes including earlier directions for release of amounts and bank guarantee-related issues are pending before NCLAT in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 438 of 2019 and TA (AT) No. 176 of 2021
  • Referenced order dated 25.02.2026 in IA No.742 of 2021 which noted that VNR was sold as a going concern on 09.03.2020 for ₹12,48,70,000 with approval on 07.07.2021, but liquidation process remains incomplete
  • Found that Liquidator continues to remain accountable for residual liquidation functions including proper segregation of assets, reconciliation of estate accounts, and lawful distribution under Section 53

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The substantive reliefs sought against the Liquidator were dismissed
  • Limited direction given to Liquidator to take note of this matter while preparing project-wise and litigation-wise status report as directed in IA No.742 of 2021
  • Liquidator directed to make available/hand over any available records relating to Applicant's subcontract works to present management of Corporate Debtor
  • No monetary penalties or settlements ordered

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Liquidator must include this claim in residual liquidation accounting and reconciliation exercise
  • Liquidator to prepare comprehensive project-wise and litigation-wise status report as previously directed
  • Liquidator to ensure proper segregation of transferred and retained assets
  • Liquidator to maintain complete and transparent accounts of liquidation estate
  • Liquidator to complete statutory compliances and filings

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The application was dismissed insofar as it sought substantive directions against the Liquidator
  • Dismissal not construed as adjudication on merits of Applicant's claim
  • Applicant left liberty to pursue remedies against Corporate Debtor under present management/successful going-concern purchaser
  • Applicant may approach appropriate contractual, statutory or competent forum including Railway Authorities
  • All rights and contentions of parties left open
  • The subject matter remains part of broader residual liquidation accounting exercise