Case Details

  • Case Name / Petition: Transfer Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 902/2025
  • Court / Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar Court (Section XVI‑A)
  • Date of Order: 25‑05‑2026
  • Period of Dispute / Violation: Not specified (procedural service issue)

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: M. Rajamanikam
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Sharma R., Advocate‑on‑Record (AOR); Ms. R Shase, AOR; Mr. C Kamlesh, Advocate
  • Respondent: Yes Bank Limited
  • Counsel for Respondent: None listed in the record
  • Registrar: Sh. Apoorv Singh (Registrar Court)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petitioner seeks service of notice on the sole respondent (Yes Bank Limited) in the criminal transfer petition.
  • The court noted that proper service had not yet been effected, prompting a request for fresh steps to accomplish service.

Findings & Observations

  • The Registrar, after hearing counsel, observed that the petitioner required additional time to effect service on the respondent.
  • No substantive merits of the underlying criminal matter were addressed; the focus was purely procedural.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties or settlements were imposed.
  • Direction: Petitioner's counsel is granted one week to take fresh steps regarding service on the sole respondent.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Petitioner's counsel must initiate and complete service of notice within the stipulated one‑week period.
  • The matter is to be listed again for further hearing on 03‑08‑2026.
  • A copy of this record of proceedings is to be furnished to the concerned Advocate‑on‑Record for information and compliance.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Registrar’s order is an interim procedural direction, enforceable by the court’s scheduling authority.
  • Non‑compliance with the one‑week deadline may result in further adjournments or procedural sanctions, though none are specified in the order.