Tag
Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
7 articles
Chhattisgarh High Court rulings highlight ongoing disputes related to administrative actions and contractual obligations. Several cases involve challenges to government decisions, including blacklisting, procurement delays, and property demolition, reflecting a trend of judicial review of state actions. The court's willingness to direct reconsideration of administrative decisions, as seen in the Avinash Rai and Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank cases, suggests a focus on procedural fairness and adherence to legal processes. These developments underscore the importance of robust documentation and adherence to established protocols for businesses and government entities operating in the region, as judicial scrutiny of administrative actions remains active.
Namita Rishi Drainage Dispute: Fresh Demarcation Ordered
Petitioner Namita Rishi claims ownership of 0.1210‑hectare land (Khasra 1632/1) and alleges illegal drainage construction on her property on 08.03.2024.
Court noted prior demarcation orders (2022, 202
Avinash Rai Blacklist Order: Court Directs Review
Petitioner Avinash Rai alleges wrongful blacklisting on CSMCL’s online attendance portal, citing incorrect posting details.
Court notes no enquiry was conducted and the blacklist entry lists a differe
Kamalesh Meravi Paddy Shortage Writ Dismissed
Petition filed by Kamalesh Meravi, Asst Manager of Ranveerpur Paddy Procurement Centre, alleging paddy shortage due to delayed lifting by state authorities.
Court noted shortage of 1,636.21 quintals (
Bank of Baroda Petition Withdrawn by HC
Bank of Baroda filed Writ Petition No.1636/2023 in Chhattisgarh High Court against District Magistrate Mahasamund and Jai Ambe Saree Centre.
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition.
Cour
Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank SARFAESI Order Overturned
The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the Collector’s 13 Jan 2026 order rejecting the bank’s SARFAESI Section 14 application for want of prosecution.
The Court held the bank’s failure to appear was
Udaybhan Jaiswal's Compensation Claim Dismissed
Petitioner Udaybhan Jaiswal filed a writ petition seeking compensation for demolition of his house, shop, and courtyard under the RFCT Act 2013.
The Court held the land had been acquired and the petit
LIC Housing Finance Possession Order Stayed
Petitioners challenged a July 8, 2026 memorandum directing possession of their residential property to LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
Court noted Gazette Notification dated June 2, 2026 reassigning DRT juri