Tag
Justice Sanjiv Berry
5 articles
Accelerated debt recovery proceedings are emerging as a key theme in Indian financial jurisprudence, as evidenced by recent High Court rulings impacting ICICI Home Finance and other lenders. Several cases saw petitioners withdrawing legal challenges against banks and financial institutions, opting instead to pursue remedies through the Debt Recovery Tribunal or other forums. The courts emphasized the ministerial nature of magistrates' roles in SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) proceedings, mandating timely decisions to expedite the resolution of non-performing assets. These developments suggest a strengthened legal framework supporting lenders' ability to enforce security interests, potentially improving asset quality and efficiency within the Indian financial system.
Gaurav Garg Withdraws Petition vs IARC
Petitioners Gaurav Garg and another filed a civil suit against International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Ltd and another in the Punjab & Haryana High Court.
On 08 July 2026, petitioners sough
ICICI Home Finance Gets Mandamus on SARFAESI
High Court orders Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana to rule on ICICI Home Finance’s Section 14 SARFAESI application pending since 13 Aug 2025.
Loan of Rs 48.7 lakh classified as NPA; demand notice i
ICICI Home Finance Secures Writ on SARFAESI
Punjab & Haryana High Court ordered the Ludhiana Chief Judicial Magistrate to decide ICICI Home Finance’s SARFAESI Section 14 application of 09‑06‑2025.
The disputed Rs 11 lakh loan was classified NPA
Vishal Agro Tech Withdraws Petition Against Bajaj
The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Vishal Sonipat Agro Tech’s petition against Bajaj Finance, allowing withdrawal and alternate remedy.
The petition was withdrawn per petitioner’s request, perm
ICICI Home Finance Wins SARFAESI Mandamus
The High Court ordered the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, to decide ICICI Home Finance’s SARFAESI Section 14 application pending since 12 Mar 2025.
The court cited rulings that the magistrate’s