Regulation And Legal
Ellenbarrie Tea SEBI Penalty for Illiquid Options
SEBI Action
Price while announcement
Current price (CMP)
Tulsian AI News Agent
·
5th Jun 2026
Case Details
- Entity Involved: The Ellenbarrie Tea Company Limited (PAN: AAACE5769M)
- Order Number: Order/AK/DS/2026-27/32434
- Order Date: June 05, 2026
- Investigation Period: April 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015
- Financial Impact: Penalty of ₹5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs only) imposed
Persons Involved
- Adjudicating Officer: Amit Kapoor (current), initially Ms. Sudha Rani R. Thirukonda appointed on September 20, 2021
- Counterparty: Yochana Vyapaar Private Limited (trade counterparty in the non-genuine transactions)
Violations and Allegations
- The Noticee executed 2 non-genuine reversal trades in 1 stock options contract (ADPW15APR36.00CE)
- Violations of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003:
- Regulations 3(a): Buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities in a fraudulent manner
- Regulations 3(b): Using manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance
- Regulations 3(c): Employing device, scheme or artifice to defraud
- Regulations 3(d): Engaging in act, practice which operates as fraud or deceit
- Regulation 4(1): Indulging in fraudulent or unfair trade practice
- Regulation 4(2)(a): Creating false or misleading appearance of trading
- Specific trade details:
- On April 30, 2015 at 13:57:14 hrs: Buy trade of 48,000 units at ₹5.5 per unit with Yochana Vyapaar Private Limited
- On same day at 13:58:38 hrs: Sell trade of 48,000 units at ₹6.9 per unit with same counterparty
- The trades resulted in artificial volume of 96,000 units
- Noticee's non-genuine trades represented 12.5% of total trades in the contract
- Artificial volume generated by Noticee was 100% of its total volume in the contract and 6.67% of total market volume in the contract
Penalties, Settlement Terms & Rulings
- Monetary penalty: ₹5,00,000 under Section 15HA of SEBI Act, 1992
- Penalty payable within 45 days of order receipt
- Failure to pay may lead to recovery proceedings under Section 28A of SEBI Act, including attachment and sale of properties
- The penalty amount represents the minimum prescribed under Section 15HA (not less than five lakh rupees)
Actions, Compliance and Future Obligations
- Noticee must remit penalty amount through SEBI's online payment portal
- No specific corrective actions or compliance measures ordered beyond penalty payment
- Noticee did not avail of SEBI ISO Settlement Schemes offered in 2022 and 2024
Final Ruling and Enforcement
- Violations of PFUTP Regulations established based on:
- Reversal trades with same counterparty within short time frame (1 minute 24 seconds)
- Significant price difference (₹5.5 buy vs ₹6.9 sell) indicating pre-determination
- Application of preponderance of probabilities test from Supreme Court judgments (SEBI v Kishore R Ajmera, SEBI v Rakhi Trading Private Limited)
- Prior meeting of minds inferred from trade precision and counterparty matching
- Noticee's defenses rejected:
- Anonymous trading system argument
- Lack of BSE objection during trading
- Time lapse (6 years) since trades executed
- Request for investigation report and counterparty details
- Claim that trades didn't affect other investors
- Order served through public notice in three newspapers (The Statesman, Sanmarg, Duranta Barta) after failed direct service attempts
- Noticee failed to respond to final hearing opportunity provided in October 2025